Disputes Disputes

Beyond borders: government grants itself powerful access to data, reduced oversight

Bill C-2 has far-reaching implications for both businesses operating in Canada and civil liberties.

U.S. DOJ issues new FCPA enforcement guidance and white-collar enforcement plan, with significant implications for Canadian businesses

Canadian companies should ensure they maintain robust internal controls to effectively respond to new U.S. FCPA guidelines.

Osler Privacy Jurisprudence Review – Fourth Edition – Summer 2025

With the latest case summaries and expert commentary, this review provides a greater understanding of evolving Canadian privacy law.

In a welcome sign for major new project proponents, SCC breathes new life into interjurisdictional immunity

A recent SCC decision relating to interjurisdictional immunity is a welcome development for proponents of regulatory and jurisdictional certainty.

Addressing claims where Aboriginal rights and title overlap

Overlapping claims of Aboriginal title raise complex legal and factual issues that have yet to be fully determined by the courts.

Privilege protocols as a legal imperative: implications of Lamarche v. British Columbia (Securities Commission) for regulators

The B.C. Court of Appeal in Lamarche stresses the vital need for regulators to protect privileged documents during investigations.

Ontario’s civil rules revolution? Breaking down the key proposed reforms

A controversial overhaul of Ontario’s Rules of Civil Procedure has been recently proposed.

Canada follows B.C.’s lead and recognizes Haida Nation’s title to Haida Gwaii

A recent agreement concerning Haida Gwaii is a historic step in Canada’s recognition of Aboriginal title through agreement and settlement.

Interpreting time requirements in dispute resolution clauses

A recent decision clarified the interpretation of a dispute resolution clause that stipulated when parties must request mediation and/or arbitration.

Abuse of process: the continuing saga of Morabito

The B.C. Court of Appeal has found a blended hearing of an abuse of process claim and an insider trading claim to be “fundamentally flawed”.